Penerapan Combined Compromise Solution dalam Pendukung Keputusan Program Bantuan Pelaku UMKM Kota Lubuklinggau

Penulis

  • Yogi Primadasa STMIK BINA NUSANTARA JAYA LUBUKLINGGAU
  • Yayang Eluis Bali Mawartika STMIK Bina Nusantara Jaya
  • Arie Yandi Saputra STMIK Bina Nusantara Jaya
  • Syafi'ul Hamidani STMIK Bina Nusantara Jaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63643/jodens.v5i2.329

Kata Kunci:

Assistance Program, MSME, COCOSO, Decision Support System

Abstrak

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) play a significant role in strengthening regional economies and providing employment opportunities, particularly in developing cities. The Government of Lubuklinggau City implements assistance programs for MSME actors aimed at enhancing business capacity, competitiveness, and sustainability through funding support, training, and other supporting facilities. In practice, the selection process for aid recipients is often challenging due to multiple evaluation criteria, diverse data, and the potential for subjectivity in assessments. To address these challenges, this study applies the Combined Compromise Solution (COCOSO) method as an optimization approach in the decision-making process. COCOSO is a metaheuristic algorithm that integrates parallel cooperation and information exchange mechanisms among subpopulations, producing more optimal solutions and accelerating convergence. In this research, COCOSO is utilized to process various selection criteria,. The list of alternatives was obtained from the Department of Cooperatives, Small and Medium Enterprises of Lubuklinggau City. The experimental results indicate that this approach provides fairer, more objective, and transparent decision-making compared to traditional methods. Therefore, COCOSO can serve as an effective decision support system to assist the government in distributing MSME assistance programs more accurately and precisely in Lubuklinggau City.

Referensi

Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia, Data Statistik UMKM Tahun 2023, Jakarta: KemenkopUKM, 2023.

BPS Indonesia, Statistik Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) 2023, Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta, 2024.

Saputra,AY,Primadasa,Y “Penerapan Metode Technology Acceptance ModelTerhadap Faktor Kepercayaan dan Risiko Dalam Penggunan Aplikasi Fintech,” Cogito Smart Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, 12-2021.

R. Susanto dan M. Fitri, “Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penentuan Penerima Bantuan UMKM Menggunakan Metode SAW,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2021.

G. Turban, E. Aronson, dan T. Liang, Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, 9th ed., Pearson, 2018.

S. Mardani, Z. Govindan, A. Zavadskas, “A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve sustainability problems,” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1697–1723, 2017.

X.-S. Yang, Nature-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithms, 2nd ed., Luniver Press, 2010.

E. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, J. Zavadskas, Z. Antuchevičienė, “A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making,” Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 25–44, 2016.

E. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, Z. Antuchevičienė, J. Zavadskas, “A new hybrid method of CoCoSo with grey numbers for multi-criteria decision-making problems,” Informatica, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 301–320, 2018.

A. Siregar dan N. Hutagalung, “Penerapan Metode CoCoSo untuk Penentuan Prioritas Penerima Bantuan Sosial,” Jurnal Informatika dan Sistem Cerdas, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2023.

R. Purwanto, “Analisis Komparatif Metode SAW, TOPSIS, dan CoCoSo dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” Jurnal Komputer Terapan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 77–85, 2023.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2021.

M. Nazir, Metode Penelitian, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2019.

Creswell, J. W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.

N. Dewi dan A. Setiawan, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian UMKM Menggunakan Metode MOORA,” Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer (JIK), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2022.

F. Lubis, A. Fadli, dan D. Prawira, “Perbandingan Metode MOORA dan VIKOR dalam Pemilihan Alternatif Terbaik,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 233–241, 2021.

S. Yuliana dan M. Hasan, “Penerapan Metode VIKOR untuk Penentuan Kinerja Karyawan Terbaik,” Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2022.

D. W. Utama dan A. Rahman, “Implementasi Metode CoCoSo dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku,” Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi (JTSI), vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 214–223, 2023.

J. Zavadskas, M. Amiri, E. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, “Extension of the CoCoSo Method with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets,” Symmetry, vol. 11, no. 9, 2020.

M. S. Firdaus, “Aplikasi Metode CoCoSo dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Sosial,” Jurnal Sains Komputer dan Informatika (J-SAKTI), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 65–74, 2023

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

30-12-2025

Cara Mengutip

Primadasa, Y., Eluis Bali Mawartika, Y., Yandi Saputra, A., & Hamidani, S. (2025). Penerapan Combined Compromise Solution dalam Pendukung Keputusan Program Bantuan Pelaku UMKM Kota Lubuklinggau. Journal of Digital Ecosystem for Natural Sustainability, 5(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.63643/jodens.v5i2.329

Terbitan

Bagian

Artikel